Tuesday, September 27, 2016

Gaston's Giant Bird (Gastornis gigantea)

Gaston’s Giant Bird (Gastornis gigantea) was a large, flightless bird that inhabited North America during the early Eocene. It was the largest and one of the last members of its genus and the largest terrestrial vertebrate in its ecosystem. 

Mounted skeleton of Gastornis gigantea. Wiki.
Etymology
Gastornis has had an interesting taxonomic history in which two generic names were used in Europe and North America; Gastornis and Diatryma respectively. Coined in 1855, the genus Gastornis was named in honor of Gaston Plante who discovered the first fossils of the type species (G. parisiensis) in Paris, France, combined with the Greek word ornis, meaning “bird”. The now defunct name Diatryma was coined by American paleontologist Edward Drinker Cope in 1876 based on fragmentary material recovered from the Wasatch Formation of New Mexico. Diatryma was derived from the Greek word diatreme, meaning “through the hole”, referring to the large foramina that penetrated some of the foot bones.

The similarity between the European and North American specimens was acknowledged as early as 1884 by American ornithologist Elliott Coues, but researchers debated the relationship between the two for nearly a century. Starting from the early 1980s, several authors began to recognize the great degree of similarity between the European and North American specimens and began to place both within the family Gastornithidae. Thereafter, scientists tentatively began to accept the synonymy between the genera pending a comprehensive review of the anatomy of these birds in 1997. Diatryma is now recognized as invalid, with Gastornis now taking priority. The scientific name of the North American species Gastornis gigantea, formerly Diatryma gigantea, may therefore be translated as “Gaston’s Giant Bird”.

Habitat & Distribution
Fossils of Gastornis have been found in Paleogene deposits from the northern European countries of France, Germany, Belgium, England, as well as the United States, Canada, and China. During the late Paleocene, Gastornis seems to have been mostly restricted to Europe which at that time was a tropical archipelago similar to modern day Indonesia. During the early Eocene, when Europe became connected with the other northern continents, Gastornis appears to have migrated to North America and Asia where they gave rise to G. gigantea and G. xichuanensis respectively. These birds inhabited the tropical rainforest environments which covered the Northern Hemisphere throughout much of the Paleogene.

Physical Attributes
The largest of the genus, Gaston’s Giant Bird was still smaller overall than an Ostrich (Struthio camelus) in terms of linear measurements. However, the former was much more heavily-built with an estimated body weight of 175kg (385.8lbs), compared to the maximum 145kg (320lbs) for the largest modern Ostriches. The height at the top of the hips was about 130cm (4.3ft), and the height at the top of the head with a fully outstretched neck was about 200cm (6.7ft). The skull was large with a deep, laterally-compressed beak with nostrils positioned in front of the eyes and midway up the skull. The skeleton was robust with particularly short and massive vertebrae and a compact torso. The vestigial wings were highly reduced and probably would have been indistinguishable from within the long body feathers as seen in many modern flightless birds. A 2007 study has found the Gastornithidae to be an early offshoot of the avian order Anseriformes, the group which contains all of today’s waterfowl (ducks, geese, swans, etc).

Although Gastornis fossils have been numerous and well-preserved, its ecology has been a matter of controversy. Past authors has suggested that these birds were herbivores. The traditional portrayal of Gastornis, however, has been that of a large carnivore which hunted the diverse array of smaller mammals with which it coexisted. This view of a predatory Gastornis was brought to life in the first episode of Walking With Beasts (2001), which depicts a female G. geiselensis terrorizing a forest full of bite-sized mammals. 



Those who favor the predator hypothesis site the birds’ massive skull, powerful jaw muscles, and large size. However, as I alluded to in an older blog post (here), the blunt and straight-edged beak of Gastornis was ill-suited for stripping flesh from carcasses. The eyes are set more to the sides of its head, an adaptation most commonly seen in prey animals that provides a wider field of vision while limiting the visual field overlap which predators use to judge the distance between themselves and their prey. Furthermore, each of Gastormis’ toes terminated in a blunt hoof-like claw, useful for gaining traction on almost any surface but not useful for pinning down its prey.

Close-up of the skull of Gastornis gigantea. Although large and  undoubtedly 
powerful, the beak lacks the hooked tip which modern predatory birds use to 
tear the flesh of prey. The small eyes are also set far apart, limiting the depth 
perception which predators rely on when seizing prey. Wiki.
Several recent studies have revealed further details about the diet of Gastornis. The jaw musculature has been found to be similar to that of modern herbivorous birds. Studies of the calcium isotopes in the bones carried out in 2013 yielded no evidence of animal matter in these birds’ diets, instead showing similar biochemical profiles to those known fossil dinosaurian and mammalian herbivores.

Ecology & Behavior
Rather than being giant predators, Gastornis have been confirmed instead to have been a large browsing herbivores; more like giant land-parrots than terror birds. With their powerful, crushing beaks, they likely fed on a variety of hard-shelled fruits and seeds, as well as the woody branches of trees and bushes. Furthermore, adult Gastornis were the tallest animals in their ecosystems and thus would have had competitive advantage over other herbivores in their environments in being able to access plants that were higher off the ground. The predator niches of the late Paleocene-early Eocene in the Northern Hemisphere were instead occupied by terrestrial crocodilians (Pristichampsidae), creodonts (Oxyaenidae and Hyaenodontidae), mesonychians (Mesonychidae), and early carnivorans (Miacidae).

Gastornis were the largest terrestrial vertebrates in Europe during the Paleocene, a time when the largest land mammals were no larger than tapirs. The structure of the Paleocene terrestrial ecosystem in Europe may have been similar to that of Madagascar prior to human occupation, which had been home to a host of small to moderately-large mammals with the largest terrestrial vertebrate being the giant herbivorous Elephant Bird (Aepyornis maximus). After Europe became connected to the other northern continents, Gastornis was successful in colonizing these new regions where, for a time, they remained the largest herbivores on the landscape. However, these birds increasingly had to compete with ever larger mammalian herbivores, some of which having attained the size of modern rhinos by the middle Eocene when these birds seem to have disappeared from the fossil record.

Eggs attributed to Gastornis have been identified from parts of Europe, including southern France. These eggs were slightly larger than those of a modern Ostrich, with a maximum length of 17.8cm and a diameter of 12cm, an estimated volume of 1330.4cm3, and an estimated weight of 1.4kg when fresh. These were, in fact, the second largest bird eggs ever known, surpassed only by the Elephant Bird of Madagascar. On the basis of egg mass, the parent birds have been estimated to have been between 135.4 to 156.4kg. These estimates match the mass estimates for Gastornis and no other bird alive at the time were large enough to have laid these eggs.

References & Further Reading
Angst D, Lecuyer C, Amiot R, Buffetaut E, Fourel F, Martineau F, Legendre S, Abourachid A, Herrel A (2014). “Isotopic and anatomical evidence of an herbivorous diet in the early Tertiary giant bird Gastornis. Implications for the structure of Paleocene terrestrial ecosystems”. Naturwissenschaften 101(4): 313-322 <Full Article>

Angst D, Buffetaut E, Lecuyer C, Amiot R, Smektala F, Giner S, Mechin A, Mechin P, Amoros A, Leroy L, Guiomar M, Tong H, Martinez A (2014). "Fossil avian eggs from the Palaeogene of southern France: new size estimates and a possible taxonomic identification of the egg-layer". Geology Magazine: 1-10 <Full Article>

Mustoe GE, Tucker DS, Kemplin KL (2012). “Giant Eocene bird footprints from northwest Washington, USA”. Paleontology 55(6): 1293-1305 <Abstract>

Buffetaut E (2008). “First evidence of the giant bird Gastornis from southern Europe: a tibiotarsus from the lower Eocene of Saint-Papoul (Aude, southern France)”. Oryctos 7: 75-82 <Full Article>

Agnolin F (2007). "Brontornis burmeisteri Moreno & Mercerat, un Anseriformes (Aves) gigante del Mioceno Medio de Patagonia, Argentina". Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales 9: 15-25 <Full Article>

Witmer LM & Rose KD (1991). “Biomechanics of the jaw apparatus of the gigantic Eocene bird Diatryma: implications for diet and mode of life”. Paleobiology 17(2): 95-120 <Full Article>

Cockerell TDA (1923). “The supposed plumage of the Eocene bird Diatryma”. American Museum Novitates 62: 1-4 <Full Article>

Friday, September 2, 2016

What is a Tapir?

Tapirs (Tapiridae) are forest-dwelling perissodactyls that first appear in the fossil record during the early Eocene, about 55mya. The earliest tapirs were small animals no bigger than modern house cats, with Oligocene forms growing substantially larger reaching the size of domestic pigs. Tapirs appear to have a rather conservative body plan which has allowed them to survive relatively unchanged apart from size since their Eocene origins. The modern genus Tapirus, for example, would have been instantly recognizable to us if we could travel back in time 10 million years or more. Such conservatism is in stark contrast to other modern perissodactyl groups, horses and rhinos, which have achieved a diverse array of morphotypes and ecologic niches over their long evolutionary histories. The presence of tapir bones at a fossil site is seen as a reliable indicator that the locality once covered by a well-watered forested environment during prehistoric times. There are four accepted species of tapir alive today together with a possible fifth species (Tapirus kabomani) described in 2013 whose status is still being questioned.

The four accepted species of modern tapir. From left-to-right, top-to-bottom:
the Lowland Tapir (Tapirus terrestris), Baird's Tapir (Tapirus bairdii),
Mountain Tapir (Tapirus pinchaque), and the Asian Tapir (Tapirus indicus).

The most notable attribute of tapir anatomy is the fusion of the nose and upper lip into a short trunk or proboscis, similar to those of elephants. This appendage is a highly mobile and dexterous tool used to gather and manipulate food. To support this structure, tapir skulls have had to undergo considerable modifications compared to other perissodactyls. The nasals have migrated to the back of the skull and the eyes have been moved forward. Certain elements of the facial skeleton itself have been retracted and reduced and the airway has become inclined relative to the long axis of the skull. These cranial features in modern tapirs that are associated with the presence of the proboscis are present as far back as the late Eocene-early Oligocene genus Colodon.

The skull of the early Oligocene tapir Colodon occidentalis (top)
is remarkably similar to that of the modern Lowland Tapir (middle-left).
Both animals have skulls with greatly retracted nasal bones and ample
insertion areas for the nasal cartilage and musculature (middle-right)
which comprise the highly mobile proboscis (bottom).

Top
image: Figure 1 from Colbert, 2005.
Middle-right image: Figure 2 from Witmer, 1999.
Bottom image from Wiki.

All tapirs, both living and extinct, are small to large forest-dwelling browsers with muscular, compact bodies and digitigrade feet. There are four toes on the front feet and three on the rear feet. For the first months of their lives, tapir calves have a coat of short, brownish fur patterned with pale stripes and spots which serve as efficient camouflage on the forest floor. Tapir cheek teeth are bilophodont, that is, the transverse crests have joined to form a continuous ridge which helps break softer plants. Ironically, the canine teeth are greatly reduced in size and often lost in adult tapirs, while the third upper premolars are enlarged and are caniniform in shape.

A mounted tapir skeleton at the Montbeliard Museum of Natural History (Wiki).

The modern tapirs are generally thought of as short-haired animals associated with the warm forests of the tropical zone. However, tapirs have undergone most of their evolution and dispersal in the seasonally cool, temperate forests of Eurasia and North America. The vast expanses of grassland and desert habitat in the Middle East and northern Africa have served as a natural barrier preventing the group’s dispersal into Subsaharan Africa, and their dispersal into South America was a relatively recent event that took place during the Pleistocene. Among the four living tapirs, the Mountain Tapir is adapted to live in the cold, montane forests of the Andes Mountains and is clad with a thick coat of wool-like fur. Thus, this species is a good model when attempting to reconstruct the more northerly distributed tapirs that existed during the Pliocene and Pleistocene.

A Lowland Tapir calf at Hamburg Zoo in Germany. Tapir calves gradually lose their striped
coat pattern until they attain their adult coloration after their first year of life (Wiki).

All tapirs demonstrate a fondness for water and will spend large parts of the day swimming or resting in rivers and lakes. They will instinctively retreat to deep water when they sense a predator. Tapirs consume a wide variety of leaves and fruits in their respective habitats and are important seed dispersers in their ecosystems. Some plants have, in fact, formed mutual relationships with these animals in which they may only germinate after passing through the digestive tract of a tapir.

A Lowland Tapir swimming. All tapirs are partly aquatic in nature and spend
much of their time in bodies of freshwater (Wiki).

References & Further Reading
Voss RS, Helgen KM, Jansa SA (2014). “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence: a comment on Cozzuol et al (2013)”. Journal of Mammalogy 95(4): 893-898 <Full Article>

Cozzuol MA, Clozato CL, Holanda EC, Rodrigues FHG, Nienow S, de Thoisey B, Redondo RAF, Santos FR (2013). “A new species of tapir from the Amazon”. Journal of Mammalogy 94(6): 1331-1345 <Full Article>

Colbert MW (2005). “The facial skeleton of the early Oligocene Colodon (Perissodactyla, Tapiroidea)”. Palaeontologia Electronica 8(1): 1-27 <Full Article>

Holbrook LT (2001). “Comparative osteology of early Tertiary Tapiromorphs (Mammalia, Perissodactyla)”. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 132: 1-54 <Full Article>

Witmer LM, Sampson SD, Solounias N (1999). “The proboscis of tapirs (Mammalia: Perissodactyla): a case study in novel narial anatomy”. Journal of Zoology 249: 249-267 <Full Article>

Jefferson GT (1989). “Late Cenozoic tapirs (Mammalia: Perissodactyla) of western North America”. Contributions in Science 406: 1-22 <Full Article>


Macdonald, David W. The Princeton Encyclopedia of MammalsPrincetonNew JerseyPrinceton University Press, 2009 <Book>